236
submitted 7 months ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 33 points 7 months ago

Can someone explain me this? In Argentina, the majority of the workers are employed by government (crazy rate of employment by a government, I don't think they actually need all those people), but then the majority of the voters elect someone that plans to cut spending a lot, meaning most of those workers that voted him will be laid off.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 16 points 7 months ago

Make Argentina Great Again.

Sad to see people fall for the same bullshit over and over.

[-] Unpigged@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 7 months ago

Can we theorize a situation where an average Argentinian voter consciously chooses a short term crisis with the prospect of normalization over a lifetime stagnation and decay? Argentina's economy was shit for a long time, and maybe people's intent is to wreck things for a change?

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 5 points 7 months ago

People forget accelerationists exist... I doubt Trump would have won without them.

[-] SheDiceToday@eslemmy.es 1 points 7 months ago

I know they're out there, but there can't be a significant enough bloc of them to swing things. I've never encountered one outside of the internet, and even on the internet they mostly seem to be acting facetiously.

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago

I know tons of them IRL. They just said things like this country is already shit? What's the worse thing that happens, Trump burns everything down? That's what we need to happen anyway to move forward.

I have heard that sentiment a lot.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 0 points 7 months ago

Do you have any evidence that a significant number of voters have ever voted for short-term harm to enable some hypothetical future benefit?

[-] snake_case_guy@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 7 months ago

2015 elections. Actually, 2015 elections are a better example than this. Argentina wasn't half as bad as now. And people in the most important place (Conurban region) view for the change, because there was a solution that was not peronism. Unfortunately, Macri let everyone down with his gradualism strategy, instead of a shock strategy. That's why the peronism came back.

I'm simplifying a lot of stuff, there are other reasons for everything. Like Cristina's legal issues, the kirchnerist party corruption, and the sort. In the same vein, Macri's lack of boldness in some cases created a crisis of its own.

[-] RickyRigatoni@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 months ago

You really think the average and below person is going to be able go make that connection?

this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
236 points (97.2% liked)

World News

37361 readers
1586 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS