RPGMemes

10182 readers

524 users here now

Humor, jokes, memes about TTRPGs

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Dalimey@ttrpg.network

moondog@ttrpg.network

422

Because if I am you'll all be dead before you've Pearl of Power'd (startrek.website)

submitted 10 months ago by Stamets@startrek.website to c/rpgmemes@ttrpg.network

17 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Dagnet@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Disengage and dex save doesnt apply to how tanky rogues are? "And if they miss, they get nothing" in the same paragraph you wrote Scorching Ray? It isnt about how much dmg and tanky they are in a thread that is really only about that (a comment thread you started yourself talking about being tanky and doing dmg)? My man, this discussion is over, but only because it's clear you have no idea what point you are trying to make.

[–] Susaga@ttrpg.network -1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Please read what I wrote before you try to claim I'm contradicting myself.

Disengage doesn't make them more tanky because the person they disengaged from can walk the same distance the rogue did and hit them again. Rogues do not get a speed boost without a cost in actions that negates the effectiveness of their speed boost.

Dex save does not apply to weapon attacks or to Scorching Ray, which uses attack rolls.

Three attacks are more likely to hit than one attack. If the rogue misses one attack, they've missed all their attacks. If one ray that comes from Scorching Ray misses, there are several others that might stand a chance.

My comment, and every comment that came after, was about how neither damage nor tankiness is better than tactical planning. Which you STILL haven't responded to! Don't try to claim it's about something I specifically stated, in every single comment, it's not about!

[–] Stamets@startrek.website 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I hope you're both aware that this post is mocking you two and these exhausting/petty/nonsensical arguments.

[–] Susaga@ttrpg.network 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

That's not how I saw your post. The post was taking a stance against spellcasters being superior by pointing out their limited resources. It was making an argument. There was no mockery of the argument itself.

I was the one mocking arguments about which is better by pointing out they're both defeated by the guy who just lets them fight between themselves.