this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
39 points (62.3% liked)

Technology

59317 readers
4683 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uAssets/issues/5184#issuecomment-1829172308

Twitch is a dangerous website, the extension probably won't be back. They could still easily target you at any time and you are just lucky they are sending ads. After some time of using the extension twitch will react and become even more toxic.

Twitch even has a network sniffer in its source code (among other things), its so much worse than just ads, some of these experiments are basically malware/pup that no-one would install on their device willingly, these instances aren't just left over code from some library they are deliberately crafted experiments that are present in the active code path.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] orhtej2@eviltoast.org 47 points 11 months ago (3 children)

The duck did I just read, some AI is attempting SEO or something?

What an absolute garbage statement devoid of any proof nor tbh technical possibility to implement.

[–] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago (1 children)

based on the randomly inserted code block that isn't even syntax-correct, to say nothing about how it doesn't even make sense, seems to be a tell tale sign of either 1.) AI generated or 2.) schizophrenic generated

[–] Aatube@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

hmm, which parts of it aren't syntax correct? see below, they made an extension before pulling it

[–] crystal@feddit.de 5 points 11 months ago

I don't see an issue in these two lines.

The only thing is that they are most likely not actually successive lines (because otherwise that code would be pretty weird).

I think that the point of the code is only to show the function names.

[–] BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

MostlyJustBored's account 3 weeks old with no history. We should take whatever that guy says with a grain of salt.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] vfsh@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 11 months ago

The whole salt flat *

[–] Aatube@kbin.social -4 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Maybe you should update your post to reflect that, because right now it's kinda clickbaity

[–] Aatube@kbin.social -3 points 11 months ago (2 children)
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] Aatube@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Take down the unhinged ramblings?

[–] Aatube@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Watching others suffer from mental illness isn't "interesting."

[–] Aatube@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Nothing’s confirmed yet, plus I posted this with the interest of having someone knowledgeable try and verify the accusations.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Oh! Good news: it's total lunacy, as also indicated by others.

But if that was really your intent, maybe the title should be "Is this real or not?" instead of some clickbaity junk

[–] Aatube@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I’m pretty sure “claim” and “new” already tell you “is this real or not”.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

"Unhinged amateur who can only read function names overreacts to some boring JavaScript" would be more accurate.

[–] Aatube@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)
  1. I really doubt that the function names are really there, after all almost all big websites have their JS minified now...
  2. They said "No, I am not just looking at variable names you amateurs." before accusing the other user featured in the screenshot of hacking their computer
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Like I said, unhinged.

[–] Aatube@kbin.social -5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I doubt it’s just SEO… The fact that his first attempt at the comment was deleted by uBlock’s team and that his claim to be the developer of a now pulled Twitch adblock extension makes this interesting