this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
14 points (100.0% liked)

Australia

4410 readers
160 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
lodion@aussie.zone
Fluid@aussie.zone
bestusername@aussie.zone
eatham@aussie.zone
Nath@aussie.zone
14
Clare O’Neil silent on whether ‘missing’ man was told to check in when released from immigration detention (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 2 years ago by LineNoise@kbin.social to c/australia@aussie.zone
2 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Border force has suggested man was ‘non-compliant’ but Guardian understands he was not read his visa conditions or fitted with ankle bracelet

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 1 points 2 years ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:

Clare O’Neil has refused to rule out that a man was able to leave immigration detention without electronic monitoring because Australian Border Force failed to read out visa conditions to him.

On Monday the ABF commissioner, Michael Outram, referred to four instances of alleged “non-compliance” with strict new electronic monitoring conditions for people released after a high court ruling on indefinite immigration detention.

It is understood the man was not verbally briefed on the conditions of his bridging visa and the ABF did not fit him with an ankle bracelet as it was required to do – unless the immigration minister granted an exemption.

The high court ruled this month that indefinite immigration detention was unlawful when there was no real prospect of deporting the non-citizen in the reasonably foreseeable future.

The court’s reasons were published on Tuesday afternoon, endorsing the possibility of re-detaining people convicted of serious crimes under a preventive detention regime.

The Coalition voted against the bill, with the opposition leader, Peter Dutton, citing Labor’s refusal to include a preventive detention regime.

The original article contains 846 words, the summary contains 175 words. Saved 79%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!