this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2023
174 points (85.4% liked)

Leftism

2060 readers
4 users here now

Our goal is to be the one stop shop for leftism here at lemmy.world! We welcome anyone with beliefs ranging from SocDemocracy to Anarchism to post, discuss, and interact with our community. We are a democratic community, and as such, welcome metaposts that seek to amend the rules through consensus. Post articles, videos, questions, analysis and more. As long as it's leftist, it's welcome here!

Rules:

Posting Expectations:

Sister Communities:

!abolition@slrpnk.net !antiwork@lemmy.world !antitrumpalliance@lemmy.world !breadtube@lemmy.world !climate@slrpnk.net !fuckcars@lemmy.world !iwwunion@lemmy.ml !leftymemes@lemmy.dbzer0.com !leftymusic@lemmy.world !privacy@lemmy.world !socialistra@midwest.social !solarpunk@slrpnk.net Solarpunk memes !therightcantmeme@midwest.social !thepoliceproblem@lemmy.world !vuvuzelaiphone@lemmy.world !workingclasscalendar@lemmy.world !workreform@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zorque@kbin.social 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The problem isn't that "no one" supports them, it's that the system disallows more than two possibilities at a time. That the main sources of those two possibilities have a stranglehold on the elective process.

It doesn't help that people often see the presidential election as the only one that matters. Other candidates generally have a much better chance at state and local levels. Which is generally where that elective power is seated. Take that power and suddenly your options increase dramatically.

[–] stochasticity@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You aren't wrong, but the time to fix these problems isn't the presidential election. Ya it sucks our options aren't ideal, but pick the better option when that's the only choice you have, and when it's not decision time fight to change the decision making system.

[–] Zorque@kbin.social 0 points 9 months ago

I don't disagree, and didn't state otherwise.