Technology

59680 readers

4146 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

843

The Cybertruck Is a Disappointment Even to Cybertruck Superfans / Looking at the specs alone, the car is delivering 30 percent less range than expected for 30 percent more money (www.vice.com)

submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

291 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The Cybertruck Is a Disappointment Even to Cybertruck Superfans / Looking at the specs alone, the car is delivering 30 percent less range than expected for 30 percent more money::Looking at the specs alone, the car is delivering 30 percent less range than expected for 30 percent more money.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] MrSqueezles@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The article talking about a Cybertruck racing a Porsche

Electric motors accelerate cars faster than ones with internal combustion engines, so this wasn’t a fair fight.

Nobody's permitted to compare electric cars with internal combustion because electric is faster? I don't understand the logic.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Because it isn't a real brag. It is an apple to oranges comparison.

[–] Abnorc@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s a reasonable comparison if the goal is comparing EVs to petrol cars. If you just want to see how good the car is overall, I agree that an apples to apples comparison would be better.

[–] 100_percent_a_bot@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

By that line of reasoning it would be equally valid to compare the top speeds of the vehicles. Imo both are a bit silly, since the reason for certain advantages/disadvantages are mostly the limitations of the respective technology.

[–] Perkele@lemmy.whynotdrs.org 6 points 1 year ago

To be fair. They compared the base version 911 to the top of the line CT.