this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
55 points (96.6% liked)

Science

12903 readers
102 users here now

Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nougat@kbin.social 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

At first blush, this article seems to say that there's a solid hypothesis for which the math works consistently, and they know what they want to do in order to test that hypothesis. It's just a matter of designing and performing experiments.

But then, I read this:

[Co-author] Weller-Davies added: “A delicate interplay must exist if quantum particles such as atoms are able to bend classical spacetime. There must be a fundamental trade-off between the wave nature of atoms, and how large the random fluctuations in spacetime need to be.”

I know atoms aren't "particles," and I'm pretty damned sure they're also not quanta.

[–] anzich@feddit.de 1 points 6 months ago

Atoms are composite particles. And they surely are quantum particles as you need quantum mechanics to describe their behavior