35
Are anarchists really allowed to exist moreso than MLs? (lemmygrad.ml)
submitted 6 months ago by TeezyZeezy@lemmygrad.ml to c/comradeship@lemmygrad.ml
16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'm curious about the validity of the claim that anarchism is an acceptable form of anti-status quo politics in the US because they're not actually a threat.

Is this true? Have anarchist groups not been infiltrated as often as MLs have? Is it easier to take them down?

I only ask because I feel like any form of left wing/anti-capitalist thought would be heavily suppressed here but I don't know

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Ronin_5@lemmygrad.ml 32 points 6 months ago

There’s never been an anarchist country, but there’s been ML countries.

[-] ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 6 months ago

Wouldn’t being a country be antithetical to the very essence of anarchism?

Anarchist country feels like an oxymoron.

[-] Ronin_5@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 6 months ago

lol, yes.

[-] Erika3sis@hexbear.net 5 points 6 months ago

Ehh, is a country necessarily the same as a state?

this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2023
35 points (100.0% liked)

Comradeship // Freechat

2065 readers
62 users here now

Talk about whatever, respecting the rules established by Lemmygrad. Failing to comply with the rules will grant you a few warnings, insisting on breaking them will grant you a beautiful shiny banwall.

A community for comrades to chat and talk about whatever doesn't fit other communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
felipeforte@lemmygrad.ml