this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2023
124 points (97.7% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5205 readers
749 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
124
US Opts Out of Dutch Plan to End Fossil Fuel Subsidies at COP28 (finance.yahoo.com)
submitted 11 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
12 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lntl@lemmy.ml 8 points 11 months ago (2 children)

the US military runs on fossil fuel, can't disempower the military

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 13 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

The bulk of their operations are logistics, which can be decarbonized. And military use isn't generally subsidized in the usual sense of that word.

[–] sonori@beehaw.org 5 points 11 months ago

Even the parts that still need fuel can use synthetic or bio, if there was ever an industry where costs don’t matter it’s the military. Besides, given how much dealing with fuel limit’s operations, any reductions in front end fuel use come with a directly proportional increase in capability.

[–] lntl@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago

military still has to buy it. i mean the infrastructure to produce oil has to be there and in good working order. subsidized by the public as required.

military will only decarbonize if it's a strategic advantage that they understand. i haven't heard any talk of them doing that except in out in the outer rim where it's difficult to ship fuel.