this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
11 points (100.0% liked)
Moving to: m/AskMbin!
7 readers
1 users here now
### We are moving! **Join us in our new journey as we take a new direction towards the future for this community at mbin, find our new community here and read this post to know more about why we are moving. Thank you and we hope to see you there!**
founded 2 years ago
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Pretty much.
The co2 we are emitting into the atmosphere is leading to problems.
Rational response: reduce our co2 emissions as fast as possible.
Our constant population expansion and habitat destruction is causing a new mass extension event:
Rational response: Limit population growth. reduce environmental impact and regenerate damage already done.
Etc
etc
etc.
While I agree there are some problems that would be best solved through rational thinking, I wouldn't want to live in a purely "rational" world. The entirety of the human experience lies between the gaps of rationality.
Wanting to feel love and happiness is quite rational too. Irrational feelings are not “anti- rational” they are just orthogonal, like color to taste. But making decisions based pure on feelings IS anti-rational.
That's a popular trope that is spouted by anti-rationalists all the time, but it's a total red herring. It's one of those rhetorical tactics that is designed to disrupt judgment and put a stop to a conversation before the absurdity of the claim is made obvious. It's drilled into us as children through tv, movies, even books, but it's entirely false.
Rationalism has plenty of room for fantasy, emotion, and everything else that humans experience. It's not a choice between being rational and being a fully developed human. The choice is between being rational and being irrational. Everything else is its own separate thing.