this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
1191 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

60119 readers
2641 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lud@lemm.ee 26 points 1 year ago (5 children)

It also does that with other unrecognised user agents.

Personally I don't understand why someone would still use Google when duckduckgo has more features and is just as good for searching and in the very rare case it isn't you can easily switch back temporarily by just adding the prefix "!g" to your query.

[–] ruckblack@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I tried duckduckgo for a while and kept coming back to Google for "real" searches at work. It's not as good for searching in my experience. Yet.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Duckduckgo has become a little better than it used to be... but google has also become a whole lot worse.

[–] pohart@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

an

This is the truth. I switched back when I got a new pc at work, and google was way worse.

[–] Klear@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, I haven't quite found a replacement that is better than google, but the way the trajectories are, it's only a matter of time.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

If you're looking for research papers, duckduckgo (and yandex) is your friend - google is perfectly unusable for that these days.

[–] ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The vast majority of times I go back to Google to do a search I find it also returns useless results. I'm not convinced it's any better than duckduckgo. I think it used to be, but not anymore.

[–] sailingbythelee@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I had the same experience. I used switch between DDG and Google when DDG gave results I didn't want. During the pandemic, I remember DDG giving lots of false positives and odd, non-standard web page hits. Like, if I was searching for current COVID advice, it would give me hits from the health department in Bumfuck, Nebraska instead of, say, CDC (and I don't live in Bumfuck, Nebraska). It has really improved since then and now I can use DDG pretty much exclusively. Not having to scroll past a page of Google ads to find my search results is quite glorious.

[–] skeezix@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The 6 residents of bumfuck Nebraska would like a word with you after their Trump circlejerk.

[–] sailingbythelee@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

And I would be honored to speak with them!

[–] agileharddisk 3 points 1 year ago

I think it depends on wether google is eating the cookies or not

[–] aodhsishaj@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What's your field?

I'm in a DevOps/Cloud Engineer role and DDG works better for me than Google. No ads and somehow fewer of the gpt generated fake help articles.

[–] ruckblack@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Same vein, devops/data engineering. Maybe I'll give it another shot, I'd like to get off Google.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Big same. I’ll even bang out to Startpage to try to avoid directly using Google (!sp vs. !g), but that’s not as good either.

I bow to my search overlord Google. Until I try Grasp, Kagi, and SearXNG, and hopefully one of those will satisfy (in particular SearXNG).

Until then DDG remains my default, and I’ll !g half the time :(

[–] jamyang@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Did you use Kagi? How was it?

[–] czech@low.faux.moe 4 points 1 year ago

Been using Kagi for a few months. Now that the unlimited tier is $10 it's a no brainer, for me.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

One of the three on my to-try list, still.

[–] m_randall@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I tried it a few months ago and bought it before the trial was over. Took some time to build trust but it’s still on par with google if not better.

(My account probably looks like a shill for them but I swear I’m just a happy user)

[–] jmp242@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

I also really like Kagi, and their bundle for Ultimate users of the various text AI tools is also very helpful for work.

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I really want to ditch Google, but DuckDuckGo aint there my brother.

It may work for some simpler/lazy searches, but for real stuff, nah.

The "good" thing is that Google search is going the way of Amazon, so with Google shooting themselves in the foot and DDG catching up a bit, maybe soon they'll level

[–] lud@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Works perfectly fine for trouble shooting complicated IT problems.

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

ddg always drops one of at least two troublesome terms. Which is infuriating.

Might have to do with my settings, in which case it is a bug.

Bangs are gold (which is why ddg is my default) but i still sometimes miss exclusions.

I've switched most defualts over to DDG but Google is still better for some things. Feels sort of like the late 99s/early 00s with Altavista, Ask Jeeves, etc.

[–] slumberlust@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Isn't ducksuckgo just paying for google search with a privacy wrapper/obfuscation layer on top?

[–] yacht_boy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, except for it's Bing search not Google

[–] lud@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I think they also use Yahoo and their own scrapers too.

Not that it matters of course.