this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
1191 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

60109 readers
2059 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DontMakeMoreBabies@kbin.social 209 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Fuck Google.

Searching a tracking number from Chrome using Google? Finds a package.

Same search on Google from Firefox leads to nothing.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 78 points 1 year ago (15 children)

Hell net neutrality laws might even have relevance if they keep this up.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] lud@lemm.ee 26 points 1 year ago (8 children)

It also does that with other unrecognised user agents.

Personally I don't understand why someone would still use Google when duckduckgo has more features and is just as good for searching and in the very rare case it isn't you can easily switch back temporarily by just adding the prefix "!g" to your query.

[–] ruckblack@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 year ago (10 children)

I tried duckduckgo for a while and kept coming back to Google for "real" searches at work. It's not as good for searching in my experience. Yet.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Duckduckgo has become a little better than it used to be... but google has also become a whole lot worse.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The vast majority of times I go back to Google to do a search I find it also returns useless results. I'm not convinced it's any better than duckduckgo. I think it used to be, but not anymore.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago

I get results with DDG

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] themurphy@lemmy.world 156 points 1 year ago

Someone, light the EU signal!

Lawsuit intensifies in the distance

[–] rageagainstmachines@lemmy.world 124 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Fuck Google. Ruining the internet for profit.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago (13 children)

They dont want to just run it.

they want to control and dictate it.

Google needs a massive regulatory hammer to come down on it and smash it into dozens, if not hundreds, of tiny individual companies

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world 93 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can you say Anticompetition practices?

1 lawsuit, 2 lawsuit, 3 lawsuit ah ah ah

[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Slam dunks, yes. But does any of the people who would bring a case against then have enough money to fight an army of more lawyers? Probably not.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LWD@lemm.ee 85 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 83 points 1 year ago

YouTube thinks aarch64 Firefox is... a HiSense TV?!?!?!?!

Ah yes, televisions are exactly where the user wants lower resolution

[–] CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world 73 points 1 year ago (15 children)

They finally made YouTube unusable for me even with ublock. Refreshing the filters didn't work and told me I could only watch 3 videos.

Google was always going to win the war but I didn't expect it to be like this.

I'm now using piped for all YouTube videos.

[–] datelmd5sum@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I randomly stopped getting the anti-adblocking. On my gaming PC I never got them, on my laptop they went away after I disabled my adblocking for one video and then re-enabled it. Now I don't get them at all. Did they give up on me?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Using an alternative front end isn’t losing

Once they get rid of front ends and you go back they’ll have won

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 67 points 1 year ago (1 children)

User Agent String: A browser's way of lying about what it is, in order to not trigger some server's arcane content filtering system.

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 53 points 1 year ago (14 children)

User Agents should be optional. The whole idea of the Internet was that the server should respond the same way to the same request regardless of the client's qualities.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Epzillon@lemmy.world 63 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The more bullshit like this I read about YouTube the more I despite them. I already use GrayJay on mobile and I'm using ublock Origin + ublock Matrix on Librewolf to control cookie usage on desktop. So far I've been able escape the video player block by clearing cache.

I'm just waiting for the day they "force" me onto another frontend.

[–] Jeom@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (7 children)

doesnt ublock origin already block youtube's anti adblock?

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 61 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Hmm, anti competitive practices.

If only there was some kind of legislation that protected an open and fair internet...

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 61 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

From what I can understand from the thread, they aren't deliberatly crippling FF.

[–] windowsphoneguy@feddit.de 58 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The way I read it is Chrome gets a pass on the architecture crippling, the others don't.

Someone correct me if I got the wrong idea.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

So Google is saying out loud they are trying to be Microsoft and abuse its near monopoy to push their other products.

Got it.

[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

It looks like also this was against adblocker so, again, not specifically Firefox. Quote from the article itself:

The issue was initially reported as targeting Firefox users, but users online have said they’re seeing the delay in Chrome and Edge, too. Reddit and Hacker News users who’ve examined the code that appears to be causing the delay have said they see no indication that YouTube checks what kind of browser is in use. Mozilla’s senior brand manager Damiano DeMonte wrote in an email to The Verge that “there’s no evidence that this is a Firefox-specific issue.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] theKalash@feddit.ch 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Which turned out to also have nothing to do with FF but is targeting adblockers.

[–] lhx@lemmy.world 61 points 1 year ago (11 children)

That’s gonna be a lawsuit…

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] slimarev92@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago (10 children)

I like how nobody actually bothered to read the thread and doesn't understand this is a bug and wasn't done on purpose.

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 39 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Having bugs for platforms outside the walled garden is a feature of the walled garden. That's the beauty of it, they don't need to purposefully cripple Firefox and other engines if they just don't take it into account when creating features.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fades@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Quite a reductive statement based on a very small obscured window into what Google is doing with user agent profiling but go off I guess since you’re so sure

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] senorblackbean@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago

Switched to Freetube/Invidious. Like the sun, I'm never looking directly at Youtube.com ever again.

[–] ShaunaTheDead@kbin.social 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It might just be a coincidence but I've had a lot of trouble using Invidious or Piped lately too. Videos load and titles load, but video thumbnails don't load for me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] muzzle@lemm.ee 28 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Joke is on them, i only ever use NewPipe (or freetube on desktop)

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] fosforus@sopuli.xyz 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Steelmanning: perhaps no ARM Linux system was capable of playing 4K reliably until Asahi Linux came along?

[–] Flaky@iusearchlinux.fyi 42 points 1 year ago

Someone on the Hacker News cross-post mentioned it, but it seems like they assumed any ARM Linux device that wasn't detected as running Android was some low-power device like a Raspberry Pi, and didn't anticipate more powerful devices running bog-standard Linux until Apple Silicon and thus Asahi came along.

[–] whfsdude@dmv.social 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's probably the case that this was good intent given the lack of desktop ARM computing hardware, but they really should let the client decide the video quality.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Clbull@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Asahi Linux?

They named a distro after a beer brand?

[–] autokludge@programming.dev 69 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Asahi means “rising sun” in Japanese, and it is also the name of an apple cultivar. 旭りんご (asahi ringo) is what we know as the McIntosh Apple, the apple variety that gave the Mac its name.

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

... They named Macs after a beer brand?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bruhduh@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

Lina asahi is steamer who reverse engineering apple m1 chip for Linux, so asahi linux was distro for apple m1 at first

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sprokes@jlai.lu 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think they want everyone to use user agent switcher so that Firefox share will drop and then nobody will support it and will die.

[–] oatscoop@midwest.social 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Easy: use a user agent switcher that uses blacklists. Mine only spoofs chrome for youtube.com.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] NaoPb@eviltoast.org 14 points 1 year ago

Disgusting!

load more comments
view more: next ›