this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2023
742 points (100.0% liked)
Asklemmy
43950 readers
837 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
We'll see in the next few years\decades. Rushed to market, very suspect testing, no long term testing. All the hallmarks of below:
Quaaludes
Darvocet
Cylert
DES
Vioxx
All FDA approved and turned out to be not so good for you as long and short term studies proved.
Then you got Thalidomide that is safe but now on bothered to flip the analog to see if that was safe. And it wasn't, I grew up w/ Thalidomide babies.
Also Fen Phen
Dioxin / DDT
I can list these for days, its cheaper to settle. Why do you think they tried to bury the research data for 75 year? If its safe it should have been readily available...
Can you explain what mRNA is?
Messenger RNA
What does that mean? What's dangerous about it?
We'll see... You don't try to bury your test data for 75 years is its "safe and effective"
Can you provide evidence of who "buried" test data?
Don't you think it's weird that you can't explain what mRNA is but are so convinced it's dangerous?
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/healthcare/judge-scraps-75-year-timeline-for-fda-to-release-pfizer-vaccine-safety-data-giving-agency-eight-months
Not the hallmarks of a "safe and effective" company that has had the most lawsuits and fines levied against.
And I dont want to waste my time typing out 3 pages to educate you on mRNA, go look it up like I did. But this give a small overview on how its not "safe and effective":
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8611574/
The Washington Examiner is a right wing magazine that regularly fails fact checks. If you can't find it at a credible source it's probably not true.
The other article you linked is to an article in an Indian psychiatry publication that does not have any experimental data or methods in it, and concludes: