Technology

59422 readers

2855 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

343

Marketer sparks panic with claims it uses smart devices to eavesdrop on people (arstechnica.com)

submitted 11 months ago by thehatfox@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

57 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] EmergMemeHologram@startrek.website 6 points 11 months ago (4 children)

I've always stood by the position it's totally possible to snoop audio and match it to a bloom filter or on device least of keywords for ads. Siri is always on so your mic can be always listening and have no impact on the battery life.

In modern mobile OSs it should be clear that your mic is either on or off (to apps) and we don't see the mic on all the time as would be needed for this. Maybe there's a hack, but at the scale and being used for commercial services I think someone would have noticed.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

That's probably because you have no technical knowledge of voice recognition whatsoever.

[–] Alchemy@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Lots of people of Siri disabled entirely. My household included.

[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I have often wondered if Siri is actually off when I set it to off. It is not as though I am running ps or top as root to check. A bit of a "trusting trust".

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

At one point Google had highly specialized hardware that only listened for "ok Google"; that's why you couldn't (and AFAICT still can't) change the wake word.

Things may have changed in the years since I learned that, but I suspect recognizing a bunch of words from an ever-changing list would still need to be done in software and require the phone's CPU to run.

OTOH, the way Android phones recognize and songs for you is very much like what you described, so maybe there really is hardware already that can recognize a shitload of arbitrary sounds using practically no power.

[–] yamanii@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

And you aren't wrong, from page 2 of the article:

Amazon, for example, has previously confirmed that it uses stuff people say (and do) with Alexa for targeted ads (Amazon has long claimed that it doesn't sell customer data). But our devices are only expected to gather data on what we say when we ask them to listen to us.