this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2023
794 points (98.5% liked)

Memes

45537 readers
197 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml
sexy_peach@feddit.de
cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
cypherpunks@lemmy.ml
794
Pragernant (lemmy.world)
submitted 10 months ago by themaninblack@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.ml
62 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 10 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Wouldn't it also be greater than 1 for the same reason as OP? I think there are probably more babies in mothers than people missing testes.

[–] filgas08@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

but mothers don't have testicles

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 12 points 10 months ago

Not their own, no, but the average number of testicles in a mother's body is greater than 0.

[–] MustrumR@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

But they have the testicles of their soon to be born sons.

I would say whether it's greater than 1 or lesser than 1 is inconclusive without accurate data .

You would need to find out whether amount of men with removed testicles is greater than amount of women pregnant with a boy (after the average week when testicles appear). Also men to women ratio in global population needs to be accounted for.

[–] Feyr@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

That's easy. The number of men missing testicles is not 50%