Privacy

31930 readers

638 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

[Matrix/Element]Dead
Discord

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Question about phones: Am I overreacting? (linux.community)

submitted 11 months ago by vestmoria@linux.community to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

44 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I don't like so called smartphones (flashy devices to mine your data and other reasons) but my regular no touchscreen phone's microphone is no longer working as it should, making conversations difficult.

Enter a smartphone I received as a present, my phobia (for lack of a better word) to smartphones and my (misguided?) obsession with privacy: I don't want to use this smartphone as my default phone because I'm scared the carrier, ISP or google are going to mine my data and trace my calls.

Which might be an overreaction, because each time I use my regular cell phone, the carrier knows when I'm calling from, who I'm calling and how long the call lasts.

So I ask you: how much more data would I be leaking if I use my new smartphone for calls only, compared to a regular, no touchscreen phone?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Fake4000@lemmy.world 42 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Probably your best option now is getting a pixel phone and flashing it with graphene os.

If you can't get a pixel phone you may want to use something like lineage os and make sure you don't add any Google services to it.

[–] lemann@lemmy.one 13 points 11 months ago

100% this is the best choice for op IMO.

A big pro is that they literally don't need any Google services whatsoever by the sounds of things

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

If you can't get a Pixel, look for a phone on the DivestOS list (or the Lineage list, it can be way better than stock Android since it lacks Google anything).

DivestOS is Lineage, with some more work done, kind of between Lineage and Graphene. I really like it, actually prefer it over Graphene for my use-case (it can run MicroG as a user app in a work profile, so kind of a stepping stone for getting away from Google).

[–] Fake4000@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

That's amazing. Never knew about this phone.

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

And then install your main Apps from F-Droid (all Open Source and reviewed) and put eventual proprietary apps (get them from Aurora instead of Play) in a Shelter/Insular profile.

[–] rush@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

DivestOS would be closer to what Graphene provides for more devices

As a lineageOS fork it has good compatibility, but the maintainer regularly updates the OS and maintains it with their own hardening patches as well as patches from GrapheneOS