this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2023
53 points (90.8% liked)

3DPrinting

15607 readers
205 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: !functionalprint@kbin.social or !functionalprint@fedia.io

There are CAD communities available at: !cad@lemmy.world or !freecad@lemmy.ml

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe/ may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Has anyone thought about printing narrower lines in order to get sharper corners? Once Linear advance or Pressure advance is activated, you don't get bulging corners anymore... but can we do better?

Has this been implemented anywhere yet? Does it have a name?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sj_zero@lotide.fbxl.net -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

in 3d space, your corner extrusion would suddenly be much thinner, so the choices for your filament would be to either droop to be supported by the previous layer or for the filament to sit underextruded in space if your part cooler is really up to the challenge.

[–] callcc@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Why would it suddenly be much thinner?

[–] sj_zero@lotide.fbxl.net 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Because that's what happens when you reduce the amount of material being extruded in order to create much thinner lines in order to create sharper corners.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

But the corners will have the same amount of material, since it is basically extruding 2 times on the same location during a corner.

Which is why the original corners have too much material.

[–] callcc@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

At this point there is basically only one way of knowing :D. I'll generate some g-code and give it a go.

[–] callcc@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

It's all a question of what exactly "much thinner" means, I expect to have some positive effect of the proposed method even when the minimum extrusion width is above the threshold where things become too thin.

Overall I expect the described method to make more sense with large nozzles and wide extrusions.

Thanks for explaining what you mean!