this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2023
894 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

45644 readers
1164 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] magnetosphere@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I never claimed that Murphy protected us from specific policies. What he didn’t do was endorse a deworming drug to fight a virus, or question medical experts. That was reassuring.

[–] StandingCat@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Dont forget injecting bleach.

[–] PortableHotpocket@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Did you actually do your research on that "deworming drug"? It's been used to treat a hell of a lot more than parasites. That is just its most common use.

This has always been funny to me as someone who actually works in healthcare and regularly reads scientific studies. Of all the things you could choose to hate Trump over, the example you give is one that plenty of people in the scientific community considered to be a treatment avenue worth researching.

Damn, the media propaganda machine is effective. Trump could run into a burning building to save a litter of puppies and they'd still find a way to make everyone hate the guy. It's impressive.

[–] magnetosphere@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago

I did enough research to know that Ivermectin is ineffective against viruses. Remarking on “the media propaganda machine” won't change that.

[–] RavenFellBlade@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes. I did. Please show me a reputable, peer-reviewed study showing any evidence of Ivermectin efficacy in treating viral infection. Just one. Go on, we'll wait.

What I do know is that over the counter equine Ivermectin should never be consumed by humans, and that this spate of idiocy gave science way more data than they ever asked for on the deleterious effects of Ivermectin toxicity in humans, including blindness and death.

But go on, tell us all about how you're the expert.

[–] artvandelay@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago

https://rumble.com/v37n8gm-peer-reviewed-and-published-too-little-too-late-ivermectin-worked-against-c.html

The propoganda is strong. I used to be just like you. You've been lied to on a scale unimaginable.

[–] squaresinger@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago

Worth researching, yeah maybe. Covid was new, there was no medicine against it, so you'd expect any worthwhile scientist to throw whatever they got at the wall to see what would stick.

But it's a whole different story between scientists testing something in a study and a non-medically-trained politician recommending the non-medically-trained public to off-label self-medicate with a drug that hasn't been tested, with no dosage recommendations and with no medical oversight.

As someone who works in healthcare and regularly reads scientific studies you should know the difference.

[–] Berramos@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

You must be trolling