this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2023
960 points (92.0% liked)

The Onion

4492 readers
463 users here now

The Onion

A place to share and discuss stories from The Onion, Clickhole, and other satire.

Great Satire Writing:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] derf82@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Most sports are dominated by people with genetic gifts. But having a little extra testosterone from a genetic quirk is a completely different thing than having extra testosterone because you were born with testes.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yet the end result is the same, an advantage over those that don't have it. Why is one fair and one unfair?

Sport is arbitrary rules we decide. Some trans athletes are going to be better at some sports, not because of their trans status but because they work hard and train lots. It is just as unfair to exclude them in case another trans athlete has a genetic advantage, that most research says they don't have.

[–] derf82@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Do you have evidence that a cis woman with high testosterone remotely experiences the amount of testosterone produced by testes?

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 9 points 10 months ago

Sure https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7159262/

Also that trans athletes don't have an advantage after starting hormone therapy. https://www.cces.ca/sites/default/files/content/docs/pdf/transgenderwomenathletesandelitesport-ascientificreview-e-final.pdf

Although there are other studies which show an advantage for running (not at elite level)

[–] TerryMathews@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (2 children)
[–] Sarmyth@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

We know things are different because of the way that they are.

[–] derf82@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It is one thing to have a quirk of the same organs, it’s another to be born with a different organ that effectively produces performance enhancing hormones.

But fine, then ban cis-women with unnaturally high testosterone.

[–] KISSmyOS@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] derf82@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Atypical of the vast majority

[–] KISSmyOS@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That's a strange redefinition of words.

[–] derf82@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] KISSmyOS@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Because those women's testosterone levels are in accordance with nature, and caused by normal events.

[–] derf82@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

Normal COURSE of events, i.. not normal for a woman in general terms.

People commonly have high cholesterol. It’s still considered abnormal when you get a lipid panel back.

[–] TerryMathews@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

You said it sarcastically, but doesn't that truly address the situation that you and others believe is occurring, in a non-discriminatory way?