this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
206 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

73387 readers
5562 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I feel like other streaming platforms will follow the same process as they've proven it's worked.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sarsaparilla@kbin.social 38 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Netflix wanting to get paid for their service and content is reasonable.

Sure, it's reasonable, and why I started subscribing in the first place. But if I pay for four screens, I expect to be able to use all of those four screens, no matter what address they are being viewed from.

[–] ForgetReddit@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

Yeah that’s totally fair and Netflix fucked that up

[–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

You’re not paying for that though. The terms of service have never allowed giving other people your details and letting people outside your household use your account.

Also you can still use 4 devices no matter where you are - mobile devices and tablets and laptops are not IP restricted.

[–] Maestro@kbin.social 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Netflix started out encouraging password sharing, even promoted it on Twitter back in the days.

[–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeh, when they allowed it. They changed their terms of service.

[–] Marsupial@quokk.au 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So clearly some people did pay for that and it was changed at a later date…

[–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Companies are allowed to change their terms of service.

[–] Marsupial@quokk.au 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

People are allowed to be pissed off when they do.

[–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Absolutely they are. Didn't say they can't be.

What they can't do however is think that they're entitled to use the service in ways that are against the terms of service.

[–] rikonium@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Company decides to change the deal and terms of service to require nudes and accompanying driver's licenses photos every 21 days in this wild hypothetical

Whirlybird: Why do people think they're entitled to use a private company's service nude-free while still paying? It's in the ToS!

[–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone 1 points 2 years ago

Whirlybird: unsubscribe if the terms of service are not to your liking

rikonium: no I demand the other terms of service! Netflix is a human right!

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Mobile devices are restricted by being forced to connect to your 'home' network regularly.

[–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And that’s fine because it’s not stopping you from using your 4 devices.

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago

About a month ago we could not use the account on a smart TV in the rental home because it was away from the home network. Updating the home network wasn't an option because the family members not on the trip were still watching things at home.

Being able to watch on a phone, but not on a TV, is stupid.