this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
1316 points (99.8% liked)

Technology

59377 readers
2957 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] davetansley@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I really wish they'd drop the YouTube Music aspect of this and just do an ad-free YouTube sub. Happy to pay content creators for their work; less happy to give Google money for a music platform after what they did to Google Music.

[–] Saneless@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm the opposite. I'm still grandfathered into the $7.99 Google Music sub, which turned into YT Music + YT premium. The cheapest music service with basically free YT premium is nice

I wouldn't pay more though

[–] vinceman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You should verify you're still at that rate, looks like other people started getting warnings a while ago that it's going up.

[–] Saneless@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yep. Just got hit with $8.55 after tax a few days ago

[–] Areopagus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Interesting, I still have 7.99 charged on the 18th

[–] Saneless@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Probably a state tax thing

[–] davetansley@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's probably improved a lot since the early days. I remember it being significantly worse than the Google Music it was replacing.

[–] Saneless@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It still is in parts. Still takes a few extra taps/screens to get to playlists

They are least stopped the practice of just starting a song when you went into a playlist.

[–] Areopagus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

My big gripe was the loss of audio quality. Made me pick up Amazon music for a bit

[–] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I like YouTube music though? I refuse to give Spotify money because of Joe Rogan, and if you're a classical music lover YT is just better.

[–] davetansley@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's cool. I'm not saying they should only offer it without YT music, just that they should offer an alternative way of supporting YouTubers without buying a service you don't need.

[–] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah that I do agree with. I don't have Premium so I guess I don't know what that looks like.

[–] davetansley@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They actually did a trial of such a sub in various Scandinavian countries, cost about five quid a month or so, which is entirely reasonable. Sadly, it doesn't seem to have gone anywhere.

[–] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I just find YouTube music does random mixes better than any other platform. I really dig it!

[–] CylonBunny@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Switched over from Spotify after they went too hard on Joe Rogan, so I never used Google Music. I like YouTube music. That said, they’ve just started adding podcasts - really hope they don’t go the way of Spotify.