this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2023
842 points (90.6% liked)

Political Memes

5272 readers
2293 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 28 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Since October it's been a really easy concept to grasp. Hamas is a terrorist group that murdered and kidnapped a bunch (don't know the exact number something around 200+) of Israeli civilians, the IDF responded in a predictably overzealous way and have now killed somewhere in the neighborhood of 20,000 civilians in Palestine. Neither Hamas nor the IDF have a moral high ground here. They both need to stop killing civilians. Super easy.

[–] dragontamer@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Neither Hamas nor the IDF have a moral high ground here. They both need to stop killing civilians.

The one thing both have in common is refusal to take peace talks seriously. Hamas refuses to let go of their hostages, and Israel continues their bombing campaign against Hamas.

Its a difficult situation because these are the "adults" in the room. The civilians involved have little power at all.

[–] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 12 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Hamas did let some hostages go fwiw.

Both Hamas and the Israeli government do not want peace, though. They're on the same side in that. (Hence Israel sending cash and stuff to keep Hamas in power.)

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Israel sending cash…to keep Hamas in power

Oh no…

NYT article (no paywall)

That’s… bad.

Vetted one of the Times’ claims too: the Israeli press decrying the Qatari payments in 2014.

[–] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 months ago

It's pretty fucking bad.

The Israeli government directly aided the terrorist attack that killed over 1000 people. They're not protecting their citizens. Leveling Gaza doesn't protect shit. They're not changing their policies. They are a disaster both for the Israeli and Palestinian people.

[–] Facebones@reddthat.com 2 points 9 months ago

Meanwhile Israel has bombed known locations of hostages AND shot a few of them.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Hell, if anything, hamas is more interested in releasing the hostages than Israel is. They've let a few go, meanwhile the idf says "never forget" while turning Gaza into a crater. They don't give a flying fuck about the hostages.

[–] dragontamer@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Hell, if anything, hamas is more interested in releasing the hostages than Israel is.

What the fuck? Hamas fucking took those hostages to begin with and started this mess.

There's a comprehensive peace plan proposed by Egypt and Qatar. When Hamas steps up to the table and accepts the peace deal, then maybe you'd have grounds to stand on. But for now, Hamas refuses to give up the hostages, and continues to fight.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

They took hostages for a reason, ostensibly to exchange them for something. Hamas doesn't want peace though, so why would they care about a peace plan? Also, as mentioned before, they have released a few already.

[–] dragontamer@lemmy.world -4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

They took hostages for a reason, ostensibly to exchange them for something.

Yeah. Human shields. And they're still using them as human shields. Its like terrorist tactics 101 here.

[–] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

"terrorist" is loaded language

[–] dragontamer@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Fine

Hamas fights using plain clothes, blending in with the civilian population and uses irregular and dishonorable tactics, like building military bases inside or under Hospitals to use as a human shield.

Or like how most people would call it, they're fucking terrorists.

If you want a more precise legal terms, perhaps violating Geniva conventions, irregular, human shields, asymmetric. These are people who pretend to be civilians while fighting, while kidnapping civilians to use as shields.

[–] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

does Israel recognize a Palestinian state? it seems like they own Gaza when they want to treat them like subjects, and they don't when they want to treat them like an opposing state.

[–] dragontamer@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Does Hamas was to be treated as a state?

Part of that means telling and training your combatants to wear a uniform, so your enemies at war can tell the difference between civilians and combatants.

Wearing civilian clothes while attacking and killing people is literally a terrorist tactic. You aren't supposed to blend into the crowds and use them as human shields.

[–] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

so Gaza isn't an independent state?

[–] dragontamer@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

They certainly don't act like one, not with Hamas as leading them.

That's part of the problem. I think the PLO or PLA might be better leaders for them.

Did you look at the Egyptian peace deal? No one wants Hamas running Gaza anymore. Hamas has failed miserably and even the Muslim countries of Egypt and Qatar include new governments as part of the peace deal.

[–] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

if Gaza isn't independent then they can't be committing war crimes. it's just regular crime. and Israel collectively punishing the ethnic minority are the ones committing war crimes.

[–] Meowoem@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

There is no collective punishment, measures aren't being done to punish but to limit the effectiveness of people actively trying to kill them.

If you have to hide behind 'yes what we're doing would be war crimes but technically we're not a nation' then it doesn't really change anything, regardless of what their actions are labelled they must be stopped and Israel is taking the measures it feels are needed to do this while also trying to limit the negative effects to other people caught up in this.

[–] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

There is no collective punishment, measures aren't being done to punish but to limit the effectiveness of people actively trying to kill them.

destroying homes and hospitals, shutting off critical infrastructure, bombing city blocks is definitely collective punishment.

if hamas built a tunnel under my local hospital, I would not be okay with anyone firing missiles at the hospital.

[–] dragontamer@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Uh huh....

As I said before: go talk to a soldier about this stuff. You clearly need someone who has actually dealt with war-time issues to talk with you on some basics. I've done my part at this point, but I can't just baby-sit you all day and secondly, I'm not (and never have been a soldier). I just know a few of them and we've had this discussion before. So all my knowledge is 2nd hand.

There are conventions at war, and even the dumbest grunt Private First Class receives training on these matters and have to study up on these issues (every soldier in the US Military is trained to know when, or when not, it is legal to shoot and kill). So this is something that literally any veteran in your life can discuss with you to a far deeper level than I can.


"War crimes" aren't crimes because some police officer will catch you. "War crimes" are actions unbecoming of a proper organization and cause the enemy to harm your side even more. Ex: hiding a gun on your person while surrendering, and then killing enemies with it after pretending to surrender is a war crime. Its not "illegal" per se (there's no organization who will arrest you). It just causes the enemy to refuse surrenders and harms the overall path of the war.

[–] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

It just causes the enemy to refuse surrenders

no, it doesn't CAUSE this. it is an excuse that they will use to kill people who are surrendering, even if it's the hostages they claim they are trying to free.

[–] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

so gaza is an independent country?

[–] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Hamas is a political party. does likud wear plain clothes?

[–] dragontamer@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

We literally have footage of Oct 7th with Hamas's soldiers attacking and taking hostages and what they were wearing.

They absolutely violate the dress codes of war.

[–] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

so Gaza is an independent state?

[–] SCB@lemmy.world -3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Israel tried peace talks for over 60 years. When one side's non-negotiable is "you all have a to die" it's hard to secure lasting peace.

[–] dragontamer@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

People don't seem to understand that the Genocide / Nazi argument plays against Hamas, lol.

But yeah, it's a tough situation. I'd argue that Bibi's government was pretty shit at pursuing peace though.

But that's outside the scope of the conflict today. Almost everything has to do with Oct 7th. The good news is that Egypt and Qatar want a peace to work, and as Muslim countries they're going to be Muslim-favored / more likely to have a lasting effect in the region (rather than say, a US brokered peace deal).

So a path to peace ... Or at least a ceasefire in this current flareup in hostilities... still exists. There is reason for hope.

[–] DeadHorseX@lemmy.world -3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

But yeah, it's a tough situation. I'd argue that Bibi's government was pretty shit at pursuing peace though.

Totally. He's massively implicated in propping up Hamas and undermining support for the non-militant Palestinian Authority in the West Bank. This is well-known in Israel at this point, and one reason for the coming reckoning he's going to face at the ballot box.

[–] Meowoem@sh.itjust.works -3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

This is not accepted fact anywhere but conspiracy land, there are articles saying that Israel have been far too soft on Hamas by letting aid through, limiting the effectiveness of bombing missions to limit civilian casualties, and ending prior conflicts before totally destroying them. These are all things which the international community loudly calls for, you can't be pro Palestine and say that Israel is responsible for Hamas because they have ceasefires and allow aid deliveries - you're using hardline arguments to call for a soft line, it doesn't make sense