this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2023
10 points (91.7% liked)

Stable Diffusion

4326 readers
22 users here now

Discuss matters related to our favourite AI Art generation technology

Also see

Other communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Stampela@startrek.website 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

How old of a Xeon? Because it won’t be a fast result, but maybe you are fine with it. Back when I tried this, SD 1.5 could do 20 steps at 512x512 on my Ryzen 5 3600 in roughly 7 minutes…

[–] rufus@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

It's a Skylake one, so from 2016 or something like that. I've tried stable-diffusion.cpp this takes like 15min for 20 steps on my machine, I've never measured it exactly. But it doesn't have that much features.

What I'd like to do is use one of the 'Turbo's. Just doing 1-4 steps sounds like it could make it close to usable. Guess I need to test it myself. Maybe I'll have some spare time later today. I just wanted to avoid fighting with onnx. Last time I tried to use it, it was kind of a hassle to get it running.

Edit: Oh wow, I missed the BENCHMARK .md file in the repo 🙃

[–] rufus@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Got it working. My machine needs 35s per step. So 2-3 mins for an SDXL-Turbo image. And 20s/step for an SD1.5, so 7mins for the whole image

[–] Stampela@startrek.website 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Can I offer what I believe is a better option? 1.5 LCM models. 5 steps for a good image, and they’re 5 steps at 1.5 speeds :)

I like this but obviously you can find other LCM models.

[–] rufus@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 11 months ago

Awesome, thank you very much.