this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2024
1281 points (99.0% liked)

memes

10322 readers
1639 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world -2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If that were the entire argument, yes. But I see you're desperately dodging the ageism part of the discussion here. You are fooling no one.

[–] BobGnarley@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Lol no. I never said anything ageist and neither did you in your comment. You said, you know people who are tech illiterate as well and I said wouldnt that be a problem if their job was regulating technology? The point I was making was that someone uneducated and unfamiliar with current tech, shouldnt be making laws about it. You even suggested that they were of the "tech generation" or something like that, how is anything I said even remotely ageist at all? Also, "desperately dodging" lmao you kind of seem like an idiot.

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

This comment made no sense. Go back to eating the walls. Bye.