this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2024
211 points (97.3% liked)

Privacy

32120 readers
281 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Wahots@pawb.social 153 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (8 children)

"develop a technological standard that might turn a user’s electronic device into the proof of age necessary to access restricted online content."

Can we not? Can parents just take care of their kids like they have for thousands of years instead of futility trying to babyproof the internet for a minority of people? Jesus.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 56 points 10 months ago

Especially since parenting is the only thing that's going to actually work. Do you think kids won't figure out a VPN? If they heard enough to type "pornhub", they'll hear about the one extra step.

And there are worse things on the Internet than porn. Some likely on Roblox.

You're just going to have to parent your kid with or without this nanny state blocking scheme.

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 48 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It's like mandating all cars need to have an ignition interlock because some people drive drunk.

[–] pugsnroses77@sh.itjust.works 14 points 10 months ago

or a real example that most newer cars have a "check rear seat for occupant" alert because some people forget their babies in the backseat and they die...

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

The difference is that the people involved there are adults and there is no equivalent to the parent responsible for their behaviour so a technical solution makes more sense there.

[–] Dempf@lemmy.zip 5 points 10 months ago

That was the opinion of the Supreme Court nearly 20 years ago in Ashcroft vs. ACLU, but here we are.

[–] PropaGandalf@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Yeah fuck the state. Only overprotective, power hungry loosers work there anyways.