Technology

57800 readers

3662 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

141

Apple’s rejection of Hey calendar app revives an old feud (www.theverge.com)

submitted 8 months ago by AnActOfCreation@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.world

40 comments fedilink hide all child comments

• Apple rejects Hey calendar app for not allowing non-paying users to do anything within the app.

• Hey had previously faced a similar rejection from Apple for its original iOS app four years ago.

• Hey plans to fight Apple's decision, but the specific approach is not yet known.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 39 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You hit the nail on the head. Apple needed to add a whole in-app purchase interface to the store UI to make it clear that the free game you're about to download charges $50 for berries and the game is practically unplayable without them.

They now need to categorize apps as requiring a subscription as the only means to "buy" it or even just use it.

If the software is free to download but requires a subscription for the service, the button needs to say "Subscribe", not "Get". And the app info needs to show you, in loud type, the minimum buy-in cost.

[–] PlantDna@mander.xyz 1 points 8 months ago

And an another category that, this app requires to signup for an account to use it