this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2024
524 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

60075 readers
3572 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
524
‘Impossible’ to create AI tools like ChatGPT without copyrighted material, OpenAI says (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 11 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
320 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

‘Impossible’ to create AI tools like ChatGPT without copyrighted material, OpenAI says::Pressure grows on artificial intelligence firms over the content used to train their products

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 41 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Wow! You’re telling me that onerous and crony copyright laws stifle innovation and creativity? Thanks for solving the mystery guys, we never knew that!

[–] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago (2 children)

innovation and creativity

Neither of which are being stiffled here. OpenAI didn't write ChatGPT with copyrighted code.

What's being "stiffled" is corporate harvesting and profiting of the works of individuals, at their expense. And damn right it should be.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

at their expense

How?

[–] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee -2 points 11 months ago

‘Data poisoning’, encryption, & copyright.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world -4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Please show me the poor artist whose work was stolen. I want a name.

If there is no victim there is no crime.

[–] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Click here to find out more

Just because you think art isn't actually work and artists don't deserve to be paid for the work they do doesn't make it okay and doesn't make you right.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world -2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Instead of screenshots why can't you just type in the name? Why is basic research to back up your defense of the current copyright system so freaken impossible?

[–] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

How many you want, apart from Sara Winters up there and 8Pxl, who I linked to. I have 25 pages of them from court documents. Roughly 4,000 names in total, in alphabetical order.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.407208/gov.uscourts.cand.407208.129.10.pdf

If I hadn't included screenshots, you would've just claimed they were made up. Keep moving the goalposts, AI shill.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world -2 points 11 months ago

Type the name.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

deleted

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world -2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Attack the argument not the person.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

deleted