Science

3072 readers

10 users here now

General discussions about "science" itself

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

https://lemmy.ml/c/science

https://beehaw.org/c/science

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Sal@mander.xyz

fossilesque@mander.xyz

The "10,000-hour rule" was debunked again. That’s a relief. (www.vox.com)

submitted 8 months ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/science@mander.xyz

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] reflex@kbin.social 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

and the rest I guess is just natural talent?

The article links another one by Slate that mentions genes and age (when starting the activity). The main article also mentions personality and life history.

Genes seems to be a big one though, at least in the Slate article, and I suppose natural talent necessarily has a genetic dimension to it.

[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 months ago

So, why read the Vox "article" when I can just read the Slate one?