372
Microplastics Found In 88 Percent Of Sampled Food, From Sirloin Steaks To Plant-Based Burgers
(www.iflscience.com)
this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2024
372 points (98.2% liked)
science
15012 readers
678 users here now
A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.
rule #1: be kind
<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.
2024-11-11
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
They should have been banned in the early 80's when we found out how dangerous they are. Humans refuse to be inconvenienced though.
Or there are some megacorps that teach us that so we grow up not even remembering there were any alternatives. Reusable containers were a thing just like paper bags and paper wraps, refills can become a thing one day, but in the supermarket I see individually packed old cucumbers like they are dicks in a condom, and I cringe at the thought they'd be trashed just like that.
How dangerous are they? I see lots of articles about them being in everything but not much about what they actually do when they get inside you.
We don't know yet, and that's a little scary.
Tiniest pieces of plastic from for example tires would classify as fine dust particles, which is like a containerword for tiny particles from any kind of material, as long as it'stiny enough it counts as PM. PM10 and PM2.5 is somewhat researched. Breathing in fine dust particles often and in large quantities for sure ain't healthy, correlation with lung irritation, asthma, etc. Whether it's specifically the plastic share of the PM that's bad: still unknown I think.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Particulates
Blame petrochemical/oil companies.
Plant based biodegrade plastic exist...
Yes, but they cost a few pennies more. So that's not possible.
(☞ﾟヮﾟ)☞
(╯°□°）╯︵ ┻━┻
That’s why “recycling” is so popular I think. The industry knew that there would be pushes against plastic, and came up with an ingenious way to make you the one “responsible” while also selling you the fairy tale that we could just reuse the stuff forever. People feel good about themselves for putting stuff in the blue bin, without realizing the near certainty that it’s going to end up in the landfill too.
It's not a question of convenience. Plastics require several magnitudes less energy to produce goods than alternatives like metal, glass and wood. If we stop using plastics today our emissions will sky rocket so high the planet will start boiling.
We need to force governments to recycle better, because a lot of plastics are completely ignored in many countries.
Here's a quick example. My hobby is 3D printing and I live in the UK. The most common plastic in this hobby is PLA. It is both sustainable and recyclable. But Britain doesn't recycle it as part of household waste. There are companies here which offer PLA recycling, but they require at least 50L worth of PLA to pick it up from you. I use about 5kg per year, so even if I throw away everything I print, I will need 10 years to fill the recycling order. But since I only want to throw away failed attempts, it will take a lifetime to fill it.
If my council would start using hot composters instead of cold ones I could at least throw my PLA waste into compost with food and it would decrease into lactic acid, but the government doesn't give a shit, so all my plastic goes into landfill.
The plastic products are generally for convenience. I'm not talking about the production.
Nope.