this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2024
891 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

59422 readers
3035 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

How Disney and Warner Bros. Are Causing Internet Piracy to Boom | Platforms like Netflix, Hulu, and Disney+ were supposed to do away with pirated media. Instead, they may make them stronger than ever.::Platforms like Netflix, Hulu, and Disney+ were supposed to do away with pirated media. Instead, they may make them stronger than ever.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jrest18n@lemmy.world 99 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Yup.

I basically don’t pirate music because streaming is convenient.

I generally don’t pirate games because steam and GOG is convenient. (Sometimes if I’m not sure ill enjoy it I’ll pirate as a no limit trail then buy or drop).

I generally have to with movies and shows. Even though I have access to several streaming platforms though stuff like T-Mobile, AT&T, etc. it’s too annoying to jump around a bunch of apps and the quality is bad compared to the UHD rips of stuff

[–] BorgDrone@lemmy.one 24 points 10 months ago (2 children)

the quality is bad compared to the UHD rips of stuff

This is why I pirate Star Trek: Strange New Worlds. I have a subscription to pretty much every streaming service in my country (Netflix, prime video, HBO max, apple TV, Sky showtime, etc. ) but Sky only has SNW in 1080p SDR. I can download it in 4k HDR. I don’t feel one bit guilty about it, I pay for the damn service that offers it. Just not in an acceptable picture quality.

[–] veng@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

It's not just quality compared with UHD rips, it's things like prime video refusing to play anything except 480p on a web browser.... WTF are they thinking?

[–] BorgDrone@lemmy.one 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I don’t use if on a browser, but even on my Shield Pro it’s not great. Prime Video seems to use a very low bitrate, there’s lots of compression artifacts, even on the 4k streams.

[–] TheBenCommandments@infosec.pub 2 points 10 months ago

It's just more enshittification. If they can get away with smaller files, they absolutely will.

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] MorphiusFaydal@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Standard Dynamic Range. It's a term adopted to differentiate non-HDR video from HDR video.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard-dynamic-range_video

[–] wikibot@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Here's the summary for the wikipedia article you mentioned in your comment:

Standard-dynamic-range video (SDR video) is a video technology which represents light intensity based on the brightness, contrast and color characteristics and limitations of a cathode ray tube (CRT) display. SDR video is able to represent a video or picture's colors with a maximum luminance around 100 cd/m2, a black level around 0.1 cd/m2 and Rec.709 / sRGB color gamut. It uses the gamma curve as its electro-optical transfer function.The first CRT television sets were manufactured in 1934 and the first color CRT television sets were manufactured in 1954. The term "standard-dynamic-range video" was adopted to distinguish SDR video from high-dynamic-range video (HDR video), a new technology that was developed in the 2010s to overcome SDR's limits.

^article^ ^|^ ^about^

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world -3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Oh, cool. Another gimmick that we are going to be fighting about which standard to use for the next few decades, making terabytes of libraries seem obsolete, and another convenient excuse for the manufacturers to discontinue old models and keep the TV prices up despite offering no real improvements and manufacturing costs and quality dropping to the floor. Nice.

[–] cactusupyourbutt@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

I used netflix until the majority of my searches didnt show a result. and then went back to pirating.

using jellyfin+jellyseer and radarr/sonarr make it almost as convenient

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If I want to buy a game it's super easy to search for it on my choice of digital store front, pay for it and download it.

If I want to watch a show I could do a search for which streaming service it's available on and hope it's one I have an account with, or for the same amount of effort I could do a search for the torrent and be able to watch it if the internet goes down.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 24 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Why not just rent each movie for 48 hours from Amazon for the bargain price of "pretty much the same as a Blu-ray disc, and often higher"?

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

This was especially frustrating with kids. All too often, with the shorter attention span of little ones, and general lack of time, where we couldn’t finish a movie that quickly. Maybe I understand that for physical media but for digital where the only scarcity is artificial?

Someone missed out on so much of my money for streaming movies when my kids were little, simply because I couldn’t guarantee finishing them in 48 hours so I didn’t rent

[–] Merlin404@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago