this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2024
85 points (92.9% liked)

Privacy

31866 readers
366 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
85
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by breeze@lemdro.id to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
 

(edit: removed redundant rants and added updates)

I recently got diagnosed with a condition (sleep apnea) which means I need to use a machine (CPAP) to have a proper sleep, probably for the rest of my life. The doctor wanted me use the device for a few months, and bring the "report" generated by the device to monitor my progress and discuss further treatment.

I thought it would be a simple task, like using a program or accessing a local network service like a printer would and download a file. However, as I consulted to the device distributors in my area... their sales pitch (disregarding the actual medical functions) were:

A) The machine is constantly connected via wi-fi or cellular to manufacturer's server, and user downloads the report via manufacturer's website or an app.

B) The machine has an SD card slot to which data is copied, but user have to bring its contents to the authorized distributor so they can convert them into a report file.

TL;DR: Very unsatisfied with either options. I never asked for this.

Update #1: For the reports, there's a program called OSCAR (www.sleepfiles.com/OSCAR/) that supports conversion of SD card data. Check device compatibility first. For sleep apnea related discussion, there is a forum (www.apneaboard.com) dedicated to it.

Update #2: From all the available brands, I'm inclined to buy a Chinese brand (Yuwell) simply because of costs alone, even if it is not supported by OSCAR. I see a lot of people recommending ResMed (which has OSCAR support) both online and offline, but the cost is prohibitively expensive for someone in my financial situation with local market prices. Still have to think about it.

Update #3: There's an asshole in the comments arguing "what's so special" about sleep related statistics being copied around. I concern was how those statistics get associated with customer identification (metadata) as distributors often do. Anyways, won't waste my time with the "got nothing to hide" type of dumbfucks.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] breeze@lemdro.id 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Just like the other commenter, thank you for the link. I should find one of the models available listed in there.

[–] tomkatt@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I currently use a Resmed Airsense 10 and can’t recommend it enough; best sleep I’ve ever had.

Just avoid anything by Philips Respironics. They’ve been messing around hard, class action suits and recalls and haven’t really made anyone whole from the debacle (myself included, I came out of pocket to replace my old Dreamstation).

[–] breeze@lemdro.id 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yes, I read about the recalls. In fact the local distributor that used to deal with Phillips had stopped doing it for the same reason. Thanks for the warning.

[–] tomkatt@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Hey, check out the resmed airsense 10 autoset card-to-cloud version. It’s a lot cheaper and has no cellular connectivity, no wireless module. I just found out about it tonight, thinking of buying one as a backup machine. Looks like it ticks all your boxes.

CPAP.com has a starter bundle for it right now for $400.