this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2023
2094 points (97.4% liked)

Memes

45554 readers
719 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheRevenger@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

You have the right not to be denied food or shelter.. Are you saying everyone should receive free food and shelter? How will that work? I understand small scale communes can mostly work under that idea, but a country with millions of people? Scarcity is the basis of economic theory for a reason.

[–] relevants@feddit.de 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Currently, as much as 40% of food is thrown away in the US, while millions of people experience food insecurity. The scarcity is fully intentional.

[–] original_ish_name@latte.isnot.coffee 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why is that food thrown away? You do realise that food can get thrown away for being bad? That at least takes up 10 percentage points, then there's the question on how its measured. Who is throwing this food away? If its your average Joe then I doubt their throwing it away just to make artificial scarcity. How nutritional is the food that gets thrown away?

millions of people experience food insecurity.

The US has hundreds of millions of people those people experiencing food insecurity barely make up anything. Also would that food that gets thrown away even feed everyone?

[–] relevants@feddit.de 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

those people experiencing food insecurity barely make up anything

Then it should be easy to feed them with just a fraction of the food that's thrown away?? How you could possibly say that and think it helps your point is beyond me.

[–] original_ish_name@latte.isnot.coffee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I said that because the person I was replying to was making it seem like millions of people was everyone and their mother, the truth is if they wanted artificial scarcity they would do it to more people

[–] relevants@feddit.de 12 points 1 year ago

Ah got it, millions of people suffering is not a lot, so it must not be a real issue. You're the worst kind of person.

[–] MaxVoltage@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

a yez the classic capitalist bootlicker point

those poor people dont matter

[–] original_ish_name@latte.isnot.coffee 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

those poor people dont matter

If you read what I said, you would know I never said that

[–] MaxVoltage@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

i apologize i did summarize

[–] LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Capitalism creates scarcity to generate profit. We live and have been living in a time of unprecedented efficiency productivity and abundance. Artifical scarcity is used to keep workers from resisting wage slavery.

[–] original_ish_name@latte.isnot.coffee 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Companies would rather sell more product then pretend for it to be rarer (except for stuff like diamonds but those are selled to rich, successful people anyway)

[–] Miqo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

That's such a naïve thing to say. Artificial scarcity is incredibly common and used as a marketing tool by nearly every industry. My favorite example is when digital content has "limited edition" copies.

[–] Viclan@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Literally what are you talking about??? Why would a company not enforce artificial scarcity, it means they have to produce less and their product is more valuable per item. It costs companies to produce more product, they’re not interested in selling a good product just anything that will keep profit margins high. If anything they’d lay off the actual laborers to keep their executives nice and comfy while “cutting costs” across the board. Why do we subsidize farmers to overproduce and we still have people suffering food insecurity?