46
submitted 5 months ago by Bob@midwest.social to c/usa@lemmy.ml

If you live in New Hampshire, I suggest you call your state legislators to support this bill. Approval Voting is a very small change that goes a long way! If you don't live in New Hampshire, send this to someone who does!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I'm not sure it is though. In ranked choice voting I can safely hedge my bet as my second or third choice. In approval voting I can't do that because I risk electing my second or third choice over my first choice.

Theoretically it works better because you only vote for candidates you approved of. But that's never been how human psychology works. If all of the Democrats tick Biden's name just to make sure then you've essentially brought us back to current method with extra steps. Ranked Choice is the method to go to.

[-] Tak@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 months ago

I agree, I'd rather prioritize my support for those I support most instead of applying it equally as if I approve of candidates equally.

[-] Bob@midwest.social 2 points 5 months ago

That's not what they did in the 2020 primary. Only a small number of people cast safety votes for Biden when they were given them freedom to vote for as many people as the liked.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago

We don't need to look at old exit polling. RCV is in use in 17 states. Furthermore, people are more likely to conform to approval voting's theoretical framework in a poll because it doesn't have any weight behind it. In the two elections that have actually used approval voting candidates all ran a single vote message and voters largely refused to vote for more than one person.

The thought experiment falls apart in reality.

this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2024
46 points (92.6% liked)

United States | News & Politics

6940 readers
146 users here now

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS