Technology

59629 readers

3336 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

261

AI girlfriend bots are already flooding OpenAI’s GPT store (qz.com)

submitted 10 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

75 comments fedilink hide all child comments

AI girlfriend bots are already flooding OpenAI’s GPT store::OpenAI’s store rules are already being broken, illustrating that regulating GPTs could be hard to control

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] tias@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Vector databases are relatively good at this kind of thing, because they can find records based on queries that are semantically close instead of just a lexical search. It would probably still make sense to split the information up in fragments such as e.g., "Interstellar movie," "watched on February 2nd, 2021," "made me vomit", and then connect those records to each other. GPTs are good at that kind of preprocessing. The idea would not be to store exact data such as timestamps and that's not how vector databases work, so recall would be more associative just like for humans (I can't ask you what movie you watched on Feburary 2nd, 2021 and expect an accurate reply either).

[–] ExLisper@linux.community 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

But you would have to do something like multiple steps of preprocessing with expanding search depth on each step and do it both ways: when recollecting and changing memories. Like if I say:

Remember when I told you I've seen Interstellar last year?
AI: Yes, you said it made you vomit.
I lied. It was great.

So you process the first input, find the relevant info in the 'memory' but then for the second one you have to recognize that this is regarding the same memory, understand the memory and alter it/append to it. It would get complicated really fast. We would need some AI memory management system to manage the memory for the AI. I'm sure it's technically possible but I think it will take another breakthrough and we won't see it soon.

[–] tias@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 10 months ago

Again, you will certainly hit limitations if you push it, but the example you give would work fine if you just append the added information to the database. A query for Interstellar would return both your original statements and the fact that you later said you lied about it, and all of these records are inserted into the GPT's context (short-term memory) when discussing that subject.