Steam Deck

14850 readers

48 users here now

A place to discuss and support all things Steam Deck.

Replacement for r/steamdeck_linux.

As Lemmy doesn't have flairs yet, you can use these prefixes to indicate what type of post you have made, eg:
[Flair] My post title

The following is a list of suggested flairs:
[Discussion] - General discussion.
[Help] - A request for help or support.
[News] - News about the deck.
[PSA] - Sharing important information.
[Game] - News / info about a game on the deck.
[Update] - An update to a previous post.
[Meta] - Discussion about this community.

Some more Steam Deck specific flairs:
[Boot Screen] - Custom boot screens/videos.
[Selling] - If you are selling your deck.

These are not enforced, but they are encouraged.

Rules:

Follow the rules of Sopuli
Posts must be related to the Steam Deck in an obvious way.
No piracy, there are other communities for that.
Discussion of emulators are allowed, but no discussion on how to illegally acquire ROMs.
This is a place of civil discussion, no trolling.
Have fun.

Link to our Matrix Space

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

Moxvallix@sopuli.xyz

codus@leby.dev

timi@lemmy.world

RolAIDS05@lemmy.world

Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz

RolAIDS05@sopuli.xyz

Using multiple machines to stream to one source (lemm.ee)

submitted 10 months ago by GluWu@lemm.ee to c/steamdeck@sopuli.xyz

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

With the advancements in steamlink, do you think we'll be able to use more than one source to render? If I have 2 mid desktops, could steamlink get the resource and computing distribution along with the synchronization(or pre-rendering?) to use both machines to stream to my steamdeck?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works 17 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I doubt it, SLI is hard enough and thats in the same system yet alone over a network

[–] GluWu@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

I feel like both AMD(ATI) and Nvidia gave up on dual gpu architecture because new next generation single units were immediately putting dual systems to shame with cost and power. There was really no need for the gaming sector to take up networked computing.

The systems, architecture, logistics, all that stuff has been made for large systems because that's just necessary. We wouldn't have AI as we know it without it. The question is will some company think there's enough profit to make that worth scaling down to consumer hardware.

As I wrote that I wrote profit, and there is no profit in letting people take their weaker older systems and cluster/ mesh them so you don't have to buy bigger newer tech. So no, this will never happen. Valve might have done it a while ago just as a side project fuck you, because they used to be like that. But now they sell hardware alongside the big boys. No more fun.

[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 11 points 10 months ago

It won't happen because the negatives outweigh the positives. There's so much extra overhead to keeping the cards synced that it's not worth it.

Other workloads can do it because they're inherently different. Gaming is all about extremely precise timing.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 1 points 10 months ago

I don't know if it will "never" happen, but it will probably happen in the open source Linux space first, so unless you're keen on rolling your own solution, it will just be a matter of waiting.