this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2024
117 points (99.2% liked)

Open Source

30511 readers
283 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] assembly@lemmy.world 33 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Thanks so much I had not been tracking this case but it pissed me off to no end when I heard that Vizio was refusing to uphold the GPL. They are more than happy to greatly benefit from the labors of open source development but the second they have to do the smallest step in support of the GPL, they fight it. I doubt there is anything overly interesting that they could release. My mind is assuming they don’t want anyone to see the actual level of their data gathering.

[–] eldritch_lich@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The best outcome would be setting a precedent that allows FOSS organisations to send threatening letters to companies that violate the license. An individual dev maintaining a small library may theoretically be able to win a lawsuit, but practically? lmao good luck

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It might be worth something for the open source community to consider open funding for a group that would help devs to do just that. It wouldn't help everyone. But it might help enough to make an impact for everyone.

[–] eldritch_lich@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

I think this could even be related to the idea of post-open source that Bruce Perens talked about. An organisation which helps its members handle the business-y parts of running large community projects. They could handle funding, legal representation, marketing and any other support that members may want. A large number of members would make it that much more effective as well.