this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2024
39 points (100.0% liked)
askchapo
22849 readers
299 users here now
Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.
Rules:
-
Posts must ask a question.
-
If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.
-
Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.
-
Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I don't like it. It's a thing within American media to mock cultural nationalists and diasporic people who try to connect to their roots. Black cultural nationalists get caricatured as unserious people walking around with dashikis and African continent necklaces. There's a push towards assimilation within white settler society, whether it's getting the POC character to lament how they're forever "too white among POCs but too POC among white people" or POC actors being forced to put on a minstrel performance for the amusement of a white audience. You rarely see a culturally connected POC character who isn't also a walking stereotype show up and put the banana/oreo/coconut in their place.
This clip is basically the "too white for Black people, too Black for white people" Black character putting the Black character who's definitely not too white for Black people in his place.
Thanks, good points.
It rubbed me the wrong way too. The message seems to be: The aspiration for POC, the solution to their problems is to become white / become bourgeois. That racial struggle is essentially a positive struggle to become bourgeois, not a negative struggle against a racist class society.
The goal of bourgeois society is to make wealth appear accidental. Being rich is then seen as a natural attribute on the same level as having dark skin. So to criticize someone for being rich can then be seen as equal to racial discrimination. Never mind that wealth is directly tied to the conditions of society itself, and that in capitalist society, the capitalists' wealth is causally tied to the poverty of the masses.