Technology

59605 readers

3094 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

259

How a 27-Year-Old Codebreaker Busted the Myth of Bitcoin’s Anonymity (www.wired.com)

submitted 10 months ago by kalkulat@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

89 comments fedilink hide all child comments

"This is the story of the revelation in late 2013 that Bitcoin was, in fact, the opposite of untraceable—that its blockchain would actually allow researchers, tech companies, and law enforcement to trace and identify users with even more transparency than the existing financial system."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] bjorney@lemmy.ca 26 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Every time there is a transaction the sender's funds are mixed together with a bunch of other senders, and the recipients receive their money from this random pool, so there is no direct association between sender/receiver

[–] stown@sedd.it 29 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Automated money laundering.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yes I laundered some of my salary from work. don't report me please.

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I mean, pretty much yeah. I think it's super clever and elegant, but I'm not going to lie to myself about what the main purpose for something like that would be.

[–] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

The main purpose is to give privacy to digital transactions. Money laundering exists at a much larger scale within institutional banks like Deutsche and Credit Suisse (RIP)

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago

Because protecting privacy is always a bad thing people wearing hoodies do while. Selling babies on the black market? God every corporation and your government wants you to think that so hard. Write your senator a letter about the dangers of this technology, they'll probably email you a picture of the boner you gave them.

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Meh, anymore I'm not making a distinction between supposed criminals and country level government (and really, state level either).

Government is the single greatest source of crime IMO, because it offers deniability and the shield of legal violence against people.

And I'm not just talking about things like Ruby Ridge- those are small scale, individuals. Iran-Contra, Fast and Furious, etc, etc.

Look into the beginnings of OPEC and that cocksucker Nader.

So yea, wanting to get the grubby gubmint fingers and eyes out of my shit makes sense.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 11 points 10 months ago

This is not quite correct. You do not have to involve anybody else in your transaction. What happens is the protocol takes a random selection of 15 other people who have spent money and adds them to a ring so that your transaction could be any one of 16 different outputs. But there is no mixing of funds involved.