this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2024
170 points (96.2% liked)

World News

39032 readers
2218 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Top NATO official Adm. Rob Bauer warned Thursday that a larger war with Russia and other adversaries is a real threat amid the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.

Bauer, chair of the Western security alliance’s Military Committee, said “not everything is going to be hunky dory in the next 20 years.”

“I’m not saying it is going wrong tomorrow, but we have to realize it’s not a given that we are in peace,” he said at a press conference in Brussels. “That’s why we have the plans, that’s why we are preparing for conflict with Russia and the terror groups if it comes to it.”

Bauer emphasized the security alliance is defensive and does not seek conflict or a wider war.

“But if they attack us, we have to be ready,” he added.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Prolly nukes. At which point who cares any more.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Considering the poor state of all their military equipment, I wonder how many of their nukes are actually functional.

[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

I hear this said a lot, but unfortunately if one is working that is one too many

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The nice thing about having 6000 nukes is you only need about half of them.

[–] LiamMayfair@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think a half of a half of a half of a half of half of that would probably do just fine too tbh

[–] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago