No Stupid Questions
No such thing. Ask away!
!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rules (interactive)
Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.
All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.
Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.
Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.
Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.
Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.
Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.
That's it.
Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.
Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.
Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.
Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.
On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.
If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.
Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.
If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.
Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.
Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.
Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.
Let everyone have their own content.
Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.
Credits
Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!
The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!
view the rest of the comments
Strange. I thought decentralized power is anarchistic. Kind of opposite to historical communist regimes.
You'll find no shortage of irony in the Lemmygrad scene, I assure you.
Communism is defined as stateless. Karl Marx said that while a vanguard party may be a path to achieve communism, it's not communist until the state is dissolved. Until then, it's socialist.
There is such a thing as anarcho-communism. There's even Christo-communism. Communism doesn't actually rely on authoritarianism conceptually, even if it has done so in practice for some big examples. Capitalism doesn't require liberalism either, the UK is an example of that, and the Republican US tendency towards religious conservatism.
Correlation vs causation can be difficult to establish in politics, but i think it's a good idea to separate out the definitions of words based on the theory behind them. Marx imagined communism to be a classless society, while authoritarianism requires hierarchy. This is one reason anarchist communism has been a concept since the late 19th century.
Nobody says that capitalism requires liberalism, and as you have mentioned yourself, there are plenty of examples of non-liberal capitalism. However, I am not aware about even single country with communist party in power, which was in any way “stateless”. Quite the opposite. And there were/are multiple examples.
And while there “is” such thing as anarcho-communism, it is “is” as any other utopian fantasy. But I think it is a pleasant fantasy for many people, thus, they are attracted to such things like fediverse. So, I see your point.
I think it's a mixed bag. While anarchistic approaches do lean that way (and there's a lot more I need to learn about it beyond the nonsense I was told in school), the communist ideology also gave a lot of power to workers, but on the flip side, taking the approach of a centrally planned economy requires a concentration of power. So, the world is full of contradictions, I guess