this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2024
421 points (97.9% liked)

Not The Onion

11834 readers
1131 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Odds that the DA who decided to charge the pastor is a shitheel republiQan: 99.999%.

Let’s check the board . . .

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Interesting: the DA is a Democrat who said he will not seek re-election two weeks ago: https://www.tmj4.com/news/local-news/milwaukee-county-district-attorney-john-chisholm-will-not-seek-reelection

I wonder if an ADA is looking to pick up some filthy campaign lucre by prosecuting homeless-helpers.

[–] Byter@lemmy.one 23 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

That's the Milwaukee DA. The story leads with Milwaukee but the Ohio pastor being cited was actually in Ohio, specifically Williams County. The DA there is, in fact, a Republican. Though not necessarily a "RepubliQan" as stated.

Katherine J. Zartman (R)

[–] ArtieShaw@kbin.social 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Why would a Milwaukee county DA be enforcing zoning laws in Bryan, Ohio?

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

A fair point - the Milwaukee journal sentinel article talks about people freezing in Milwaukee and then jumps to Ohio. I didn’t catch the jump and, honestly it’s a little weird. Still, my bad. Thank you all for pointing it out.

[–] Guest_User@lemmy.world -5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Great assumption and you are completely wrong. Nice try though

[–] Byter@lemmy.one 9 points 8 months ago

They're actually correct. The headline is just confusing.

[–] HopingForBetter@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

What's your point? The laws suck ass, don't align with the purported intentions of the religion backing said laws and legislators, and in fact, according to the religion the people inacting the laws are on their way to hell. So, are you also having a nice try? Caring for people is definitely not something to outlaw, and those that do are always on the wrong side of history; no debate.

[–] Guest_User@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago

Lol what? Did I mention anything about the law? No. Just commented on their assumption about the DA being a republican. Calm down lol