Asklemmy

44135 readers

1086 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

A time traveller comes back from 50 years in the future. You have 3 hours with them. What do you do? (lemmy.dbzer0.com)

submitted 11 months ago by Danterious@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

60 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Rules:

The time traveller is able to travel backward and forward through time (max forward is 2074) and they can only transport things that can fit in a small backpack.
You can choose when the 3 hours begin but it has to be in 2024 and once it has begun the timer can't be reset or stopped.
They will answer to the best of their ability but imagine this is a random person from 2074.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 22 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

He can travel back in time so I'm going the other direction with this.

I have about six hundred ounces of silver bullion.

So I'd send him back to around 2010 when silver was going for thirty bucks an ounce and Bitcoin was going for a buck a coin.

Cash out silver, buy Bitcoin, bring me the wallet.

This could be done a little more efficiently with a stop on whatever year Bitcoin was over sixty thousand, but even at today's rates, I would instantly have several hundred million dollars. I wouldn't even mind paying the taxes on that.

Why get future information that's going to take time to manifest itself when I can cash instantly?

Edit: Six hundred ounces of silver would physically fit in a backpack, but the weight would likely tear it to shreds. I'd have time for him to make multiple trips so he doesn't destroy his backpack or his spine.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 12 points 11 months ago (2 children)

To shreds you say?

[–] tpihkal@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

How's his wife holding up?

[–] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 11 months ago

To shreds, you say?

[–] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Not sure what you're getting at there, but yes.

I took two hundred ounces on a plane once. Even though that's only about fourteen pounds, it's in such a dense area, that it gave my reasonably sturdy duffle bag a tough time at its seams.

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 11 points 11 months ago (2 children)

To shreds, you say?

[–] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Ooohhhh. Thanks for the clarification

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 11 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

To shreds, you say?

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.