this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2024
146 points (83.2% liked)

Asklemmy

43859 readers
1709 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've seen a lot of posts here on Lemmy, specifically in the "fuck cars" communities as to how Electric Vehicles do pretty much nothing for the Climate, but I continue to see Climate activists everywhere try pushing so, so hard for Electric Vehicles.

Are they actually beneficial to the planet other than limiting exhaust, or is that it? or maybe exhaust is a way bigger problem?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] weeeeum@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

No, not really. Truth is that electric cars aren't here to save the planet, it's to save the car industry, from an increasingly environmentally aware market. They exist to make the thought of every citizen owning a 2 ton machine more palatable, instead of embracing better pedestrian and public infrastructure.

Granted there will always be people that need or want a vehicle, and EVs would be great for them. But that statement ignores that the majority of people would be satisfied walking or using well funded public infrastructure. The emissions from building a 1-2 ton machine of any kind, for every citizen, is environmentally infeasible.

That being said there could be a point to building high occupancy electric vehicles (buses/trucks) that could serve hundreds, if not, thousands of passengers/lbs of cargo. This could be a desperately needed stepping stone for cities too deep in car/vehicle oriented infrastructure. It will certainly give urban planners some desperately needed breathing room when the time comes to completely restructure both public and logistics related infrastructure (as in public transportation, and transportation of goods/cargo).

Also this entire comment ignores that theres no where near enough lithium produced to satisfy "sufficient production" of electric vehicles (replace current vehicles sales with electrics). There is new, lithium free, battery tech being developed. To me however, it's very foolish to gamble your planet's wellbeing, on technology that doesn't exist, to save some car companies.