this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2024
-20 points (34.8% liked)

Fediverse

28481 readers
685 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
TragicNotCute@lemmy.world
Xylinna@lemmy.world
MrCenny@lemmy.world
automodbeta@lemmy.world
woelkchen@lemmy.world
-20
Why isn't there a Harry Potter-themed Lemmy instance yet? (lemmy.world)
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by blue_berry@lemmy.world to c/fediverse@lemmy.world
40 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

It's one of the first things I would expect from a site like this. I know that J.K. Rowlings views are very controversial to put it mildly, but:

  1. The fandom/books are not the author
  2. Harry Potter will become a part of the Fediverse at some point anyways - better to support it early on and shape its developing rather than having a company build a H.P. social network on top of the fediverse, which will be to our disadvantage
  3. In terms of potential users, this could be huge for the threadiverse
  4. We are in the Fediverse: defederation is always a possibility

Or was it just never tried before / no one wanted to yet?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HKayn@dormi.zone 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Waiting for a conflict to arise just leaves you with a fractured community in the aftermath.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

In the aftermath of what? The community hasn't even formed and you are anxious about an imaginary problem?

[–] HKayn@dormi.zone 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The aftermath of the conflict you referred to in your previous comment.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 1 points 10 months ago

Again, this would be in the chance some "conflict" happened.

Do you think it's reasonable that people shouldn't even try to go for the lower-hanging fruit because they see a potential conflict that will lead to some more work?