752
submitted 5 months ago by stopthatgirl7@kbin.social to c/news@lemmy.world

Too many of the potential jurors said that even if the defendant, Elisa Meadows, was guilty, they were unwilling to issue the $500 fine a city attorney was seeking, said Ren Rideauxx, Meadows' attorney.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] JCreazy@midwest.social 60 points 5 months ago

They wouldn't have to feed the homeless if the city did a better job at helping them.

[-] BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

If not even California can make meaningful steps towards permanent supportive housing, it sure as shit won't happen in Texas.

[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 8 points 5 months ago

In CA, like everywhere, it's just a problem of money. NYC has a mandate to offer everyone temporary housing if they need it. Recently Texas and Florida have strained the system by sending thousands of migrants to NYC (100K total).

Most of them are able to find temporary housing because the city pays for it. The SF Bay Area and Los Angeles could easily do the same, but they just don't want to spend the money. They need to raise taxes slightly and get it done.

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

Its not even a thing of money.

cause other countries have proven, Giving the homeless apartments and support will let the overwhelming majority of them get back on their feet, find jobs, and take over all the payments htemselves.

and its proven that doing this is cheaper than keeping people on the street.

Cruelty is the point, not a lack of resources.

[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee -2 points 5 months ago

You think "cruelty is the point, not a lack of resources" in San Francisco? It's one of the most homeless-friendly and expensive places in the country.

Stop just copying and pasting catchphrases.

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

If your precious san fran was super homeless friendly, they wouldnt be on the streets. They wouldn't be handwaving money as a reason for ignoring them.

They can easily fix the problem. They just don't want to.

So yes. Its cruelty. thats the point.

You cant use money as an excuse to sit on your hands and do fuck all, especially if you are claiming to be the most homeless friendly area in the country, When a simple act of kindness in giving them housing, medical care, and financial aid, to get them back on their feet so they can take over the financials for themselves, is not only a good moral choice, its also the cheaper, more financially pragmatic option

But why help people and elevate them, when you can keep markets artificially inflated and line your pockets.

[-] tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 months ago

The peope being cruel and the people trying to help others are different groups, they both exist in most 'liberal' cities. Like Seattle, they have good resources for needy people compared to a lot of cities but the police are also known to have significant problems with white supremacists. And the business associations are allied with the police.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

There's a GIGANTIC difference: CA is trying, TX is not.

[-] SoylentBlake@lemm.ee -5 points 5 months ago

You're actually entirely backwards there, and I'm no fan of Texas, but they have done a far better job than any of the coastal states, at least in the major metros. Google it, I'm not kidding.

[-] Bahnd@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

The onus of providing sources is on the person making the claim. Please provide them yourself.

[-] anarchy79@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago

Or if they shot the homeless.

this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2024
752 points (98.8% liked)

News

21687 readers
3999 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS