31
submitted 5 months ago by RealWarrenBuffett@lemm.ee to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Immersive_Matthew@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago

That is a good point but I wonder if the increased supply will impact overall prices. There is a lot of used space. I have seen % of free space but not what that means in terms of how many homes this could be turned into. Love to know if we converted all free space how big of impact it may or may not have. I suspect pretty big.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Yeah, but lots of housing sits vacant right now...

And since these are high prices condos in metro areas... Most people who get them are going to have other homes as well.

Which is why this money would be better used if it went to building affordable homes for people who don't have a home

[-] Immersive_Matthew@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

That is a good point. The only thing I can think of that will have an impact is if cities demand x% of low costs housing being converted from office buildings. If they are mostly targeting rich buys then yeah…what is the point.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

If they are mostly targeting rich buys then yeah…what is the point.

I mean, it seems a safe bet Biden is doing it because people who own billion dollar office buildings tend to make large political donations... So this could just be him funneling them taxpayer money, so they give him less money in donations.

But he says he legitimately thinks this is a good use of taxpayer money and will help the average American.

Like most things Biden does, we have to try and figure out if he's lying about why he's doing it, or just really doesn't understand the problem.

Which is pretty depressing.

[-] Immersive_Matthew@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago

Oh….Ahahaha. I thought we were talking about Canada. The gov here is not paying to convert, but there are developers planning as these big towers need to find a new life and fast. In theory it should add more supply, but I think we are both agreeing that it likely will not go that way…at least not enough to bring down overall house prices. Real estate is really just about the investment with the homes and offices just tenants or purchasers a distant second. It is about maintaining real estate value above all else. At least in Canada and surely the same in the USA as we are so similar.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Yeah, this article is about US.

But I do think Canada has the same problem.

Per square foot (or however many beavers or whatever Canada uses) expensive housing earns more than an affordable one of the same size.

So developers keep building fancy housing no one can afford that sits empty, while the lack of affordable housing causes homelessness.

It's technically making more housing available, just not for the people who need more housing.

Like if there was a food shortage so the government started subsiding caviar and champagne. Sure, they're helping with food availability, it's just not helping anyone that actually has food insecurity

this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2024
31 points (87.8% liked)

News

21721 readers
3235 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS