this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2024
69 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

22848 readers
293 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

To be clear, I'm not making accusations about Vietnam, I was just thinking about it and found it a little strange.

I can think of some fairly plausible reasons, but just because those reasons are plausible doesn't mean they're actually correct, so I was wondering if anybody had a more concrete historical and materialist understanding of the situation.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] muad_dibber@lemmygrad.ml 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is 100% correct. Looking past the ๐Ÿค“ arguments about "technically in a state of war or not", the US fought a war against Vietnam and completely lost, while their war against the DPRK is in a stalemate. They're still doing military exercises to demonstrate this, and the CIA did a lot of fuckery to help exacerbate the problems during the arduous march in the 90s.

I imagine if the DPRK had won as decisively as Vietnam did, then they equally wouldn't be opposed to re-establishing economic relations