this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2024
33 points (88.4% liked)

Programming

17424 readers
45 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
snowe@programming.dev
Ategon@programming.dev
MaungaHikoi@lemmy.nz
33
Unsigned Commits (blog.glyph.im)
submitted 9 months ago by AnActOfCreation@programming.dev to c/programming@programming.dev
25 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I'm curious to hear what the Lemmy programming community thinks of this!

  • The author argues against signing Git commits, stating that it adds unnecessary complexity to systems.
  • The author believes that signing commits perpetuates an engineering culture of blindly adopting complex tools.
  • The consequences of signing Git commits are likely to be subtle and not as dramatic as some may believe.

Archive link: https://archive.ph/vjDeK

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] cadekat@pawb.social 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

This doesn't hold. Commit signature is a feature of git itself, even though the article chooses to focus on GitHub. And afaik github integration of signatures doesn't break code hosting elsewhere, GH merely allows you to register your GPG signature with them so they're able to validate the commits, but the author is still able to enroll the same GPG key to other hosts.

Not only that, but GitHub rewrites signatures on rebase (and sometimes on fast forward merge) with their own private key. Using signatures on GitHub is basically pointless.

[โ€“] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

true, that happens to me all the time

edit: I think they just rewrite the commit without signing it, not with their private key. Either way, the first signature is lost on rebasing.