this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2024
952 points (96.9% liked)

4chan

4246 readers
10 users here now

Greentexts, memes, everything 4chan.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 6 points 9 months ago (4 children)

House sizes have also ballooned. The average home size in 1949 was ~900 sq ft, whereas a new home now is ~2500 sq ft. It was still cheaper, but those homes prices are for a lot less house than people are imagining.

[–] ApexHunter@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago

Not to mention changes in wiring, plumbing, materials, insulation, engineering, finishes, appliances, etc.

[–] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

My relatively small house (~1200 sq ft) was built in 1950 and is currently appraised at $550k, so it's not just house size. Granted, I live in a highly-desirable west coast city and the lot is worth more than the house itself, but the point remains.

[–] SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I agree, it’s definitely not just house size. But still, I’m not sure that your one data point anecdote is very meaningful. Desirable areas were more expensive in the 1950s too.

[–] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 1 points 9 months ago

True, however, the concentration of wealth has meant that desirable areas are far more out of reach for the middle class than they were in the 1950s when unionization was at an all-time high and the difference between a highly-educated professional vs a skilled tradesman was more a matter of what kind of car they drove and how big their house was rather than what we see now which is working people being priced out of entire markets.

I got lucky because my wife and I bought our house when the neighborhood we're in was still seen as the ghetto. We bought it because it was the only thing we could afford and it was relatively close to my wife's parents, but since then the neighborhood has rapidly gentrified and our property value has gone way up.

This wouldn't be an issue in a country wherein wealth is not so egregiously concentrated at the top.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Larger houses are due to many factors. Weren't a lot of power tools around in 1949, and houses were heated by cast iron radiators and coal burning furnaces.

[–] SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yes that’s the point. We’re wealthier and more productive now and can consume some of that extra wealth. I am pointing out that we’re not comparing like for like.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago

Right now, most people are poorer than their counterparts from fifty years ago.

Take away technological advances like computers and cell phones that that would have occurred anyway and look at things like work hours and quality of life.

Hunter Thompson's "Hell's Angels" has a great chapter on the economics of being a biker/hippie/artist circa 1970. An Angel could work six months as a union stevedore and have enough money to hit the road for two years. A part time waitress could support herself and her musician boyfriend.

As late as 1980, 'middle class' was defined as one high school graduate supporting a family of four. After three terms of Reaganomics 'middle class' was two college grads working full time. Also, $1 million in 1980 was still a vast fortune and nowadays it's what a rich guy pays for a party.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 2 points 9 months ago

That's a lot of difference, really. Makes me wonder if this is needed, considering that the average household size had decreased from 3.33 in 1960 to 2.51 in 2023

So it was 270 ft²/person or less before, now it's about 1000 ft²/person