this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2024
518 points (85.1% liked)

Data Is Beautiful

6884 readers
186 users here now

A place to share and discuss data visualizations. #dataviz


(under new moderation as of 2024-01, please let me know if there are any changes you want to see!)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AnneBonny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 317 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I really don't like that the graphs aren't across the same period of time.

[–] sharkwellington@lemmy.world 119 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I didn't notice until you pointed it out. Because why wouldn't they be??

[–] name_NULL111653@pawb.social 54 points 9 months ago

Because there's lies, damned lies, and statistics...

[–] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 24 points 9 months ago

Presumably they are starting wherever the trend "started", although I'd like to see what it was doing before that to see if this is an unusual trend or not

[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml -2 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Because gaps in data are a thing? I dunno, it doesn't really seem to change the story or the outcome. Your concerns seem overblown.

[–] sharkwellington@lemmy.world 25 points 9 months ago

Then attention should be drawn to the fact that the timelines are different. The data is presented in a misleading way and we should hold ourselves to a higher standard.

[–] Repelle@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago

Axes should remain the same with the lines missing at parts where there are missing data. This makes it clear

[–] janabuggs@beehaw.org 17 points 9 months ago

Omg I didn't even notice that. It's like the more you look at this the worse it gets.

[–] fidodo@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'm guessing the data sets they used were collected at different start times and they didn't want to truncate it

[–] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 9 months ago

yes thats probably why but then maybe they should've left a white space instead